Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:43

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Can you share summer photos? Day 8
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What sorts of music do cats respond to?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
FAMU AD accused of stealing $24K from old job - ESPN
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Club World Cup is finally up and running — and soccer may never be the same - AP News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Increase in Ariane 6 launch cadence could take several years - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.